How Harvard’s Laurence Tribe Came to be the Nation’s Most Respected Professor of Constitutional Law

By Nicholas Stix

He lies. And he lies. And he lies.

He lies about the Constitution. He lies about federal law. And he lies about precedent.

Note that when I said Tribe is the nation’s “most respected professor of constitutional law,” within the perverse universe of corrupt, racial socialist judges, law professors, and media operatives.


I saw Tribe a couple of days ago on CNN. I forget who the host was, but Tribe was on with former AG Michael Mukasey (from the end of the Bush II years).

Mukasey said, correctly, that the Ninth circus judges were granting American Constitutional rights to foreign nationals living on foreign nationals living on foreign soil, that universities were also promoting the fiction that they could confer rights, and that the courts were promoting the fiction that they had judicial review over matters that federal law, Congress, and precedent had granted were the President’s prerogatives.

Tribe then announced that Mukasey had been “a much better attorney general than he is a law professor,” and proceeded to lie about every matter that Mukasey had discussed. Thus, Tribe granted Constitutional rights to foreigners on foreign soil (which simultaneously entails the dilution or elimination of Americans’ Constitutional rights), and eliminated all presidential prerogatives.

If what Tribe was saying was true, the President would have prerogative, and the judiciary would be omnipotent.

But Tribe didn’t even believe his own words. He never challenged presidential prerogatives when “Obama” was president, and he won’t do so, when the DPUSA recaptures the White House. Laurence Tribe is a sophist.

Unfortunately, Mukasey was much too polite, and ignored Tribe’s lies.

Note, too, that the same Ninth Circus that has illegally blocked President Trump’s lawful presidential prerogative, in stopping foreigners from entering the country, is supporting the illegal, unconstitutional acts of “Obama,” in breaking the law on behalf of illegal aliens, even after “Obama” has left office, using the same rationale it has struck down, in Trump’s case!

Laurence Tribe has been silent on this outrage. Do not expect him to challenge the Ninth Circus on this matter.

Ta-Nehisi Coates Devotee Lectures Journalist; Journalist Responds

By Nicholas Stix

I just came across the following comment on my VDARE report commemorating the tenth anniversary of the black-on-white Knoxville Horror racist atrocity committed by up to seven blacks on the white couple, Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom, which Ron Unz graciously reprinted at The Unz Review.
 

Aaron Aarons says:
• Website
January 27, 2017 at 4:09 pm GMT • 200 Words

Congratulations, Mr. Stix, on your ability to find several examples of atrocities committed over the last couple of decades by small groups from among a population of over 30 million people! Or, should I say, congratulations on your ability to get paid for such “research”.

BTW, almost all of the oppression of Blacks by whites has been and still is institutional, rather than in freelance atrocities, including in discriminatory practices by business, the “justice” system (including prosecutors and juries), and in government programs that have been tailored to favor whites. For example, there are the New Deal labor laws that excluded from their protection the two kinds of occupation mainly staffed by people of color, agricultural work and domestic work. The writer of this article and almost all of the commenters here are only concerned with the suffering of whites, and, within that, the small part of the suffering of whites that can be blamed on Black (or other non-white) people, especially when it can be used to increase the already-great oppression of Blacks. Calling those people “white supremacists” doesn’t fully capture the depth of their toxic racism.
 

Dear Mr. Aarons,

You are a despicable, racist liar. Those characteristics notwithstanding, I’ll gladly engage with you at greater length. Here’s all you need to do: Visit my blog, Nicholas Stix, Uncensored (link above), hit the PayPal button, and deposit $1,000. Once the money clears, you will be entitled to two hours of my time.

You didn’t really think I was going to make you a gift of my time, did you?

Frank Sinatra, Singing Rodgers & Hart’s “My Funny Valentine”

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

My Funny Valentine
Music by Richard Rodgers
Words by Lorenz Hart

My funny Valentine, sweet comic Valentine,
You make me smile with my heart,
Your looks are laughable, un-photographable,
Yet, you're my favorite work of art.

Is your figure less than Greek?
Is your mouth a little weak?
When you open it to speak,
Are you smart?

But don't change your hair for me,
Not if you care for me,
Stay little Valentine, stay,
Each day is Valentine’s day.

Is your figure less than Greek?
Is your mouth a little weak?
When you open it to speak,
Are you smart?

But don't change your hair for me,
Not if you care for me,
Stay little Valentine, stay,
Each day is Valentine’s day.

 

 

Uploaded on September 4, 2013, by PM793.
 

[Previously, in this series:

“Frank Sinatra: My Shining Hour (Video, from Trilogy: Past Present Future)”;

“Hear Frank Sinatra Sing Arlen & Mercer’s Come Rain or Shine”;

“Hear Frank Sinatra Sing the Quintessential Version of Harold Arlen & Johnny Mercer’s ‘One for My Baby (and One More, for the Road)’”;

“Hear Frank Sinatra Sing the Classic Harold Arlen/Johnny Mercer Torch Song, ‘Blues in the Night’”;

“Frank Sinatra: Harold Arlen and Johnny Mercer’s Stormy Weather (Video)”;

“Frank Sinatra Live! Medley of The Gal That Got Away and It Never Entered My Mind, Performed in 1980 at Carnegie Hall (Great Quality Video of a Grand Performance!)”;

“Frank Sinatra: Here's That Rainy Day (Jimmy Van Heusen/Johnny Burke)”;

“Frank Sinatra’s Revelatory, 1962 Performance of Kern and Fields’ The Way You Look Tonight”;

“Paul Robeson?! Hear Frank Sinatra Give the Definitive Interpretation of Jerome Kern and Oscar Hammerstein II’s Ol’ Man River (1963)”;

“The Greatest Song Ever Written? Hear Frank Sinatra Sing Rodgers & Hammerstein's Soliloquy”;

“Hear Frank Sinatra Sing the Real ‘New York, New York,’ by Leonard Bernstein, Betty Comden, and Adolph Green, from On the Town (1944/1949)”;

“The Swingingest Record You’ll Ever Hear! Fly Me to the Moon, by Frank Sinatra, Count Basie, and Quincy Jones”;

“Frank Sinatra: Autumn in New York, with the Billy May Orchestra (Video)”;

“Hear Frank Sinatra Make Rodgers & Hart Swing! ‘The Lady is a Tramp’; Live at Madison Square Garden/1974”;

“Hear Frank Sinatra and a Bunch of Little Kids Sing the 1960 Academy Award-Winning Song, ‘High Hopes’”;

“If Frank Sinatra were Still Alive, and were Interviewed by Larry King”;

“When Sinatra Ruled: Hear Him Sing ANOTHER Oscar-Winning Song, ‘All the Way,’ from The Joker is Wild (1957)”;

“Hear Frank Sinatra Sing Jimmy Van Heusen and Sammy Cahn’s ‘Love and Marriage’;

“Hear Frank Sinatra’s Unique Presentation of Cole Porter’s ‘I've Got You Under My Skin’”;

“Frank Sinatra Sings ‘Young at Heart’”;

“‘A Man Alone’: How Great was Sinatra? So Great that with a Voice that was Way Past Its Prime, and Less than Stellar Material, He was Still the World’s Greatest Singer—that’s How Great He was!”;

“I'll Never Smile Again: Hear 24-Year-Old Frank Sinatra with the Pied Pipers and the Tommy Dorsey Orchestra in 1940!”;

“Frank Sinatra: ‘In the Wee Small Hours of the Morning’ (1955)”;

“Frank Sinatra: I Didn't Know What Time It was”;

“Sinatra Celebration News: Pennsylvania Music Newspaper Columnist Announces Releases of Rare Radio Broadcasts and Rehearsals from 1935-1955, and Provides a Lovely, Yet Succinct Introduction to the Works of ‘The Voice’”;

“Frank Sinatra: A Swinging Ring-a-Ding-Ding (1961 Recording)”; and

“The Day the Music Died: A Photoessay on Frank Sinatra.”]

Not Exactly Flowers and Chocolates: The Passion of St. Valentine

 

 


St. Valentine, the Real Story
By David Kithcart - 700 Club Features Director
Circa February 1, 2016
CBN

Flowers, candy, red hearts and romance. That's what Valentine's day is all about, right? Well, maybe not.

The origin of this holiday for the expression of love really isn't romantic at all—at least not in the traditional sense. Father Frank O'Gara of Whitefriars Street Church in Dublin, Ireland, tells the real story of the man behind the holiday—St. Valentine.

"He was a Roman Priest at a time when there was an emperor called Claudias who persecuted the church at that particular time," Father O'Gara explains. " He also had an edict that prohibited the marriage of young people. This was based on the hypothesis that unmarried soldiers fought better than married soldiers because married soldiers might be afraid of what might happen to them or their wives or families if they died."

"I think we must bear in mind that it was a very permissive society in which Valentine lived," says Father O'Gara. "Polygamy would have been much more popular than just one woman and one man living together. And yet some of them seemed to be attracted to Christian faith. But obviously the church thought that marriage was very sacred between one man and one woman for their life and that it was to be encouraged. And so it immediately presented the problem to the Christian church of what to do about this."

"The idea of encouraging them to marry within the Christian church was what Valentine was about. And he secretly married them because of the edict."

Valentine was eventually caught, imprisoned and tortured for performing marriage ceremonies against command of Emperor Claudius the second. There are legends surrounding Valentine's actions while in prison.
 

St. Valentine, Kneeling in Supplication 

"One of the men who was to judge him in line with the Roman law at the time was a man called Asterius, whose daughter was blind. He was supposed to have prayed with and healed the young girl with such astonishing effect that Asterius himself became Christian as a result."

In the year 269 AD, Valentine was sentenced to a three part execution of a beating, stoning, and finally decapitation all because of his stand for Christian marriage. The story goes that the last words he wrote were in a note to Asterius' daughter. He inspired today's romantic missives by signing it, "from your Valentine."

"What Valentine means to me as a priest," explains Father O'Gara, "is that there comes a time where you have to lay your life upon the line for what you believe. And with the power of the Holy Spirit we can do that —even to the point of death."

Valentine's martyrdom has not gone unnoticed by the general public. In fact, Whitefriars Street Church is one of three churches that claim to house the remains of Valentine. Today, many people make the pilgrimage to the church to honor the courage and memory of this Christian saint.

"Valentine has come to be known as the patron saint of lovers. Before you enter into a Christian marriage you want some sense of God in your life—some great need of God in your life. And we know, particularly in the modern world, many people are meeting God through his Son, Jesus Christ."

"If Valentine were here today, he would say to married couples that there comes a time where you're going to have to suffer. It's not going to be easy to maintain your commitment and your vows in marriage. Don't be surprised if the 'gushing' love that you have for someone changes to something less "gushing" but maybe much more mature. And the question is, is that young person ready for that?"

"So on the day of the marriage they have to take that into context," Father O'Gara says. "Love—human love and sexuality is wonderful, and blessed by God—but also the shadow of the cross.

That's what Valentine means to me."
 

Are the Democrats Looking to Replay the Violence of the 1960s? To What End are They Again Unleashing Chaos? (Pat Buchanan)

 

 

Is the Left Playing with Fire Again?
Tuesday - February 14, 2017 at 1:35 a.m.
By Patrick J. Buchanan

To those who lived through that era that tore us apart in the ’60s and ’70s, it is starting to look like “deja vu all over again.”

And as Adlai Stevenson, Bobby Kennedy and Hubert Humphrey did then, Democrats today like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi are pandering to the hell-raisers, hoping to ride their energy to victory.

[Pat forgot to mention that it was the John Doe calling himself “Barack Obama” who revived the “tradition” of black supremacist anarchy.]

Democrats would do well to recall what happened the last time they rode the tiger of social revolution.

As the riots began in Harlem in 1964 and Watts in 1965, liberals rushed to render moral sanction and to identify with the rioters.

“In the great struggle to advance civil and human rights,” said Adlai at Colby College, “even a jail sentence is no longer a dishonor but a proud achievement. … Perhaps we are destined to see in this law-loving land people running for office … on their prison records.”

[I hadn’t realized that Stevenson was such an opportunist. I had always thought of him as primarily a bore.]

“There is no point in telling Negroes to obey the law,” said Bobby; to the Negro, “the law is the enemy.” Hubert assured us that if he had to live in a slum, “I could lead a mighty good revolt myself.”

[While as a boy and a college student, I had learned to deify Bobby Kennedy, 10-15 years ago, I concluded that he was despicable opportunist.]

Thus did liberals tie themselves and their party to what was coming. By 1967, Malcolm X had been assassinated, Stokely Carmichael with his call to “Black Power” had replaced John Lewis at SNCC, and H. Rap Brown had a new slogan: “By any means necessary.”

Came then the days-long riots of Newark and Detroit in 1967 where the 82nd Airborne was sent in. A hundred cities were burned and pillaged following the assassination of Dr. King on April 4, 1968.

And what happened in our politics?

The Democratic coalition of FDR was shattered. Gov. George Wallace rampaged through the Democratic primaries of Wisconsin, Indiana and Maryland in 1964, then ran third party and carried five Southern states in 1968.

His presidency broken by Vietnam and the riots, LBJ decided not to run again. Vice President Humphrey’s chances were ruined by the violent protests at his Chicago convention, which were broken up by the club-wielding cops of Democratic Mayor Richard J. Daley.

Race riots in the cities, student riots on campus, and that riot of radicals in Chicago helped deliver America to Richard Nixon.

Came then the huge anti-Nixon, anti-war demonstrations of the fall of 1969, the protests in the spring of 1970 after the Cambodian invasion and the Kent State killings, and the Mayday siege by thousands of anarchists to shut down D.C. in 1971.

[I wasn’t familiar with the Mayday siege. Pat Buchanan has forgotten more American history than almost all of us will ever learn.]

Again and again, Nixon rallied the Silent Majority to stand with him — and against them. Middle America did.

Hence, what did its association with protesters, radicals and Black Power militants do for the Democratic Party?

Where LBJ swept 44 states in 1964 and 61 percent of the vote, in 1968 Humphrey won 13 states and 43 percent.

In 1972, Nixon and Spiro Agnew swept 49 states, routing the champion of the countercultural left, George McGovern.

[And the DPUSA/MSM got their revenge against Nixon, for convicting the Communist spy and traitor Alger Hiss for perjury, and for twice winning the White House, by forming a criminal conspiracy in the offices of the Washington Post, and forcing Nixon to become the first President ever to resign.]

And the table had been set for California Governor Ronald Reagan, who defied campus rioters threatening him with violence thusly: “If it takes a bloodbath, let’s get it over with.”

Without the riots and bombings of the ’60s and ’70s, there might have been no Nixonian New Majority and no Reagan Revolution.

Today, with the raucous protests against President Trump and his travel ban, the disruption of Congressional town meetings, the blocking of streets every time a cop is involved in a shooting with a black suspect, and the rising vitriol in our politics, it is beginning to look like the 1960s again.

There are differences. In bombings, killings, beatings, arrests, arson, injuries and destruction of property, we are nowhere near 1968.

Still, the intolerant left seems to have melded more broadly and tightly with the Democratic Party of today than half a century ago.

Where Barry Goldwater joked about sawing off the East Coast and “letting it drift out into the Atlantic,” Californians today talk of secession. And much of Middle America would be happy to see them gone.

Where Nixon was credited with the “cooling of America” in 1972 [another reason for the racist Left to hate him!], and Reagan could credibly celebrate “Morning in America” in 1984, any such “return to normalcy” appears the remotest possibility now.

As with the EU, the cracks in the USA seem far beyond hairline fractures. Many sense the country could come apart. It did once before. And could Southerners and Northerners have detested each other much more than Americans do today?

Fifty years ago, the anti-Nixon demonstrators wanted out of Vietnam and an end to the draft. [Because they wanted the Communists to conquer South Vietnam.] By 1972, they had gotten both. The long hot summers were over. The riots stopped.

But other than despising Trump and his “deplorables,” what great cause unites the left today? Even Democrats confess to not knowing Hillary Clinton’s presidential agenda.

[What great cause? A totalitarian dictatorship, using the means of white genocide. However, the genocide has transformed into an end-in-itself. ]

From those days long ago, there returns to mind the couplet from James Baldwin’s famous book, from which he took his title:

“God gave Noah the rainbow sign/ No more water, the fire next time.”
 

Study: Detroit Least Healthy Big City in America

By Prince George's County Ex-Pat
 

Study: Detroit unhealthiest big city in America
www.detroitnews.com

"WalletHub’s data team compared 150 of the most populated U.S. cities across 34 key indicators of good health"

Only so many ways you can cook chitlins.

Houston: Paw, Wittle Iwwegal, Faweign Kwiminals are Afwaid About Wumors They’ll Have to Go Home!

By A Texas Reader

Immigrants [sic] fear deportation amid ICE raid rumors
www.khou.com

"Many people in Houston’s immigrant [sic] community are on edge following arrests last week in Austin and elsewhere."

They should end up in the morgue.

N.S.: When the anonymous, KHOU activist wrote "immigrant community," she/he/it--s/h/it, for short--was referring to the illegal alien community. Immigrants have nothing to fear.

Milwaukee: Thousands of Foreign Criminals and Their American Criminal Allies March Against the Law and Sheriff David Clarke

By Reader-Researcher RC

Thousands march through Milwaukee to protest Sheriff David Clarke's crackdown on foreigners and his plans to deputize cops as immigration agents

Thousands protest Wisconsin sheriff's anti-immigration plan
www.dailymail.co.uk

Thousands marched from Milwaukee's predominantly Hispanic south side to the downtown courthouse to protest Clarke's plans people fear will lead to mass deportations.

Blood in the Water: Trump Gives in to Enemies, Sacrifices Michael Flynn, Whom He Forced to Resign!

By Reader-Researcher RC

Top Trump Adviser in Hot Seat Over Sanctions Discussions ...
www.nbcnews.com

A senior U.S. official said the acting attorney general expressed concerns Flynn could be vulnerable because of his discussions with a Russian envoy.

N.S.: This is not going to help the President. Rather, it will just excite his cut-throat enemies all the more!

Fox News Video: The Blessings of Affirmative Action: Three Young Moslem Brothers Got Hired as Senate IT Staffers, at Wacko High Salaries ($160+K), with No Background Checks (One was a Criminal), and Proceed to Illegally Access Congressmen’s Computer Networks

🚨🚨 VERY ALARMING 🚨🚨

Three Islamic Information technology workers fired for stealing #TopSecretData from Congress I.T department

💥💥💥 WATCH pic.twitter.com/UDeLnRZn6c

— Brian Fraser (@bfraser747) February 12, 2017

 

CNN Lays Down the Obama Doctrine

By Nicholas Stix

Yesterday, on Frederika “Fred” Whitfield’s afternoon show, she was talking about President Trump’s immigration policy, including recent interior enforcement moves, arresting, and in some cases deporting illegal aliens.

Every time a guest spoke, Whitfield would interrupt him, asking if Trump’s move had exceeded what the John Doe calling himself “Barack Obama” had done. It quickly became clear that Whitfield was imposing a standard, whereby President Trump may not move against illegal aliens more aggressively than “Obama” had. Never mind that not only does “Obama” have no power over President Trump, but he was the worst president in American history, when it came to enforcing our immigration laws.

It was like listening to a Moslem invoke the name of Mohammed, as the standard of all justice and conduct.

New York Times Operative Finds New Way to Call Steve Bannon a Nazi!

By Nicholas Stix

Someone once called songwriting “a million ways to say ‘I love you.’” Well, MSM propaganda today consists of finding a million (or maybe just two or three endlessly repeated) ways of calling those on your enemies list, “Nazis.”

It seems that Steve Bannon once said something nice about an Italian philosopher who “influenced” what morphed into Fascism (then spelled Facism). And since “Fascism” is synonymous with Nazism, that makes the philosopher, Julius Evola, and anyone who cites him favorably, a Nazi! Ergo, Steve Bannon is a Nazi, Pres. Trump is a Nazi, Teump voteers are all Nazis…

By the way, the racist Left recently coined a new insult against Pres. Trump. They speak of “President Bannon.” Thus, the same people who, until about last week referred to Trump as “authoritarian,” “fascist,” etc., now refer to him as impotent.

Being a racial socialist means never having to say you’re sorry, except to colored cut-throats.

At VDARE.

“We need…” CNN’s Jake Tapper’s Election Night Boo-Boos (Video)

I was rewatching election coverage and noticed that Jake Tapper let his mask slip. Twice. "We need..." #democratwithabyline pic.twitter.com/HFLU5t7vcb

— Steve Kirby (@Skinny_Steve_A1) January 16, 2017

This Week’s Trayvon Martin/Mike Brown/S--tavious is, er, was Named “Quanice Hayes”

 

St. Quanice, or a surrogate 

Reality 

By Jerry PDX

Speaking of media evil... this just hit the news. A 17-year-old negro named Quanice Hayes was shot and killed on February 9 by a police after he committed a series of crimes, including robbery, with a fake gun. Our local media has gone into overdrive anointing him with the mantle of sainthood.

Not just one toddler picture of poor little Quanice, but a picture with Quanice and his toddler brother! How does this work exactly? Does the media knock on the door and ask the family for baby photos of black criminals, or do the families start digging and ship them off to the newspapers as soon as they have been shot (can you say, “Ghetto lottery”?)? I really don't know.

This is reminiscent of the photo of Trayvon Martin as an 11-year-old the media plastered all over the front pages. It's still the face of Trayvon Martin 99% of the American public remembers. A representative of the media claimed it was the only photo available from the family, so they had to use it. Somehow, nobody in the media had the Internet savvy to look up his Facebook page, and copy one of his own pictures he posted, showing him at an adult-sized 17, counting money, flashing gang signs and calling himself “no limit nigga”?

Speaking of ghetto lottery, a Go Fund Me page has already been set up. It starts out by stating poor little Quanice was “murdered” by police and the family can't view the body (likely for legitimate legal reasons, if true, though these people lie through their teeth so you have to take claims like that with a grain of salt) his mom is now looking for housing with 4 other kids (why did you have so many kids you can't afford, Mom?).

[N.S.: Jerry PDX included the link to the Go Fund Me page, but I deleted it, to guard against any money flowing to this family of grifters, via WEJB/NSU.]

One of our local TV "news" stations had to get in on the action in this one. Saint Quanice had aspirations of going to college and playing in the NBA... the only one they seemed to have missed is "aspiring rapper," though I'm sure you could dig that one up somewhere also.
This farce gets played out every time a negro gets himself shot by cops in our town, and from what I've seen, most media outlets play the game also with varying degrees of intensity. The only thing that makes it bearable is reading the comments, 95% of the readers are calling out the local media on this sham, which is why many in the liberal community are pressuring the local media to start censoring comments. It's already happening on a moderate level but I believe it's going to be ramped up eventually to the point those kind of comments will not be allowed.

Of note: A white man was also shot by cops the same day. He didn't get the beatification by the media but got token mention in a police "conference" with the media. You know, a conference designed to appease BLM and liberal black crime apologists.

What the hell kind of a name is “Quanice,” anyways?

President Trump Dare Not Tear Immigrant Families Apart! (Political Cartoon)

 

Six Racist New England Patriots Players and Counting are Boycotting Visit to the White House

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

The mooks in question are Alan Branch, Martellus Bennett, LeGarrette Blount, Dont’a Hightower, Devin McCourty and Chris Long. The first five names are racist blacks. Long is a white who claims he’s boycotting, because President Trump had criticized John McCain (Media-AZ), but I don’t buy it. I say he’s a white Uncle Tom, who jumped on the black bandwagon.

Recall that when Trump was running for president, he pandered shamelessly to blacks. A lot of good that did him.
 

Sixth New England Patriot announces he will skip White House visit
By Paulina Firozi - 02/10/17 08:22 A.M. EST
The Hill

A sixth player from the New England Patriots has announced that he will be skipping the trip to President Trump’s White House in the traditional visit following the team's historic Super Bowl victory.

Defensive lineman Alan Branch joins five of his teammates who have said they will not make the trip to the White House.

Branch did not specifically mention Trump in his decision but said in an interview with SiriusXM NFL Radio this week that he would stay home with his family instead.

“I’ve got four kids at home, so I’m just going to hang out with the family and continue celebrating until the next season starts,” he said.

Branch attended President Obama's White House celebration with the Patriots for the team's 2014 Super Bowl win, SportingNews reported. [Thus, he didn't attend the Obama ceremony because it was the traditional, White House ceremony, but because Obama is black. He's racist to the bone.) He joins a growing number of his teammates who have made the decision not to meet with the president to celebrate the team's win, despite the fact that Patriots owner Robert Kraft, team coach Bill Belichick and quarterback Tom Brady are friends with Trump.

Of the five other Patriots players who have announced their plans, some specifically referred to a protest of the president.

“I don’t support the guy that’s in the house,” said tight end Martellus Bennett, the first to back out of the White House trip.

Running back LeGarrette Blount, defensive end Chris Long, linebacker Dont’a Hightower and defensive back Devin McCourty have also announced that they do not plan to attend.

America Needs a New Abolitionist Movement! (Short Video)

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

Thanks again to my Twitter bud, Shane Cameron!

RETWEET THE HELL OUT OF THIS!
Newt: The ACLU has a "fascist mentality," and as for the 9th Circuit: "Don't impeach them, just ABOLISH them!" pic.twitter.com/icdhC3gjLP

— Newt-Trump Fan Club (@NewtTrump) February 10, 2017

Hispanic Illegal Alien Charged with Murdering Good Samaritan Hispanic American, but KPRC Gave Him a Chaperone, and Chopped His Name!

 












Bryan Rafael Rodriguez-Valtierra, Hispanic Male, DOB 05/27/98.
Charged with Murder.

Information Source
Lieutenant Scott Spencer
 

N.S.: That mug looks closer to 38 than to 18. Let me guess: 18 is the age on his fake ID, which was stolen from the real Bryan Rafael Rodriguez-Valtierra.
 

By A Texas Reader

Good Samaritan killed after trying to help stranded driver, officials say
By Ashlynn Turner - Content Editor
Posted: 2:25 P.M., February 11, 2017
Updated: 5:57 P.M., February 11, 2017
www.click2houston.com [KPRC]

A man accused of committing a murder in the parking lot of a Montgomery County restaurant is behind bars, officials said….

Rodriguez-Valtierra faces murder charges, and authorities say that because he is an illegal immigrant, he will be held by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency without bond….
 


 









Who’s this? He’s KPRC’s designated, white chaperone, a white felony defendant, whose pictures, including one mug shot, the channel prominently displayed at its Web site, in order to offset the photograph of Hispanic murder suspect, Bryan Rafael Rodriguez-Valtierra. KPRC also took the precaution of refusing to give Bryan Rafael Rodriguez-Valtierra’s full name, as an additional form of affirmative action. I had to go to Texas Police News, in order to find it. KPRC is thereby saying, ‘See, white people commit horrific crimes all the time, too!’

I first came upon the MSM’s practice of what I dubbed chaperoning at the Chicago Sun-Times. The chaperones are always white, or “white-enough.”

President Trump on the Lawfare being Waged on Him

LAWFARE: "Remarkably, in the entire opinion, the panel did not bother even to cite this (the) statute." A disgraceful decision!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 10, 2017

Breaking: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rules that president has zero constitutional power and presidency is merely ceremonial.

— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) February 9, 2017

Unless, that is, the President is a socialist or communist, in which case she/he/it (s/h/it, for short) is omnipotent.

At this point, as far as the racist Left is concerned, there is no Constitution, no federal or state law, no precedent, and no decency. There are only friends and enemies, and who?/whom? In other words, we are in the midst of Civil War II.

This is one of those historical developments that has a thousand birth dates. There’s the birth of so-called legal realism, 100 years ago, which decreed that activists could make up the law, including Constitutional interpretation, as they went. There’s the 1948 Supreme Court case, Shelley v. Kraemer, striking down racially restrictive covenants, in favor of forced racial integration, precedent and the Constitution be damned. There’s the 9-0 Brown v. (Topeka) Board of Education ruling, in 1954, the “sociological” decision, which was predetermined, based on fraudulent social science, perjured expert testimony (both by Kenneth Clark), and unlawful ex parte communications. There is the series of Brown-related decisions in the 1960s and 1970s, where the “liberal” justices couldn’t keep their lies straight, and blatantly contradicted their own Brown decision, in order to wage war on working and lower-middle-class whites and their children.

There are all the millions of violent, racially-motivated crimes committed by blacks against whites, and later committed by Hispanic “immigrants” against all Americans.

It's just as well, because the Ninth Circus panel's misconduct has not even the patina of lawfulness.

The Countenance Blogmeister made a wordless judgment on the present debacle:
 

 

The above image is what I recall seeing a day or two ago. However, the Blogmeister seems to have since changed the image, though not the title:

“Why Am I Thinking About Andrew Jackson Right Now?”

Here’s the current image:
 

 

I agree that President Trump should pull an Andrew Jackson. Note, however, that Trump’s action, in overriding the Supreme Court, would be perfectly constitutional and legal. It is the federal courts that are presently acting in an illegal and unconstitutional manner.

Anyone who tells you that the Constitution is whatever the U.S. Supreme Court says it is, is a liar. Nobody believes that.

True Love (Photo)

 

American Judicial Tyranny Goes Back to Marbury v. Madison (1803); Watch This Short Mark Levin Video for the Backstory

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix

I thank my Twitter bud, Shane Cameron, for giving me this.

When I was a West German university student, I read a theory—I can’t recall by whom—according to which, the principle of judicial review at the core of Marbury, crippled the Weimar Republic, and led to its demise, through tying the hands of the federal government.
 

Mark Levin - John Roberts Got Nothing Out of Marbury vs. Madison (July 2, 2012)
 


 

Published on July 3, 2012 by Breitbart Lives.

Trump Really is as Bad as Hitler! Here's Why! (Infographic)

 

Should This be the New Flag of Germany?

 

Has Neil Gorsuch Made His Lot with the Seditious, Black-Robed Tyrants, and Against President Trump? Will Donald Trump Have an Andrew Jackson Moment? (Pat Buchanan)

Re-posted by Nicholas Stix
 

 

Trump Must Break Judicial Power
Thursday - February 9, 2017 at 10:19 pm
By Patrick J. Buchanan

“Disheartening and demoralizing,” wailed Judge Neil Gorsuch of President Trump’s comments about the judges seeking to overturn his 90-day ban on travel to the U.S. from the Greater Middle East war zones.

What a wimp. Did our future justice break down crying like Sen. Chuck Schumer? Sorry, this is not Antonin Scalia. And just what horrible thing had our president said?

A “so-called judge” blocked the travel ban, said Trump. And the arguments in court, where 9th Circuit appellate judges were hearing the government’s appeal, were “disgraceful.” “A bad student in high school would have understood the arguments better.”

Did the president disparage a couple of judges? Yep.

Yet compare his remarks to the tweeted screeds of Elizabeth Warren after her Senate colleague, Jeff Sessions, was confirmed as attorney general.

Sessions, said Warren, represents “radical hatred.” And if he makes “the tiniest attempt to bring his racism, sexism & bigotry” into the Department of Justice, “all of us” will pile on.

Now this is hate speech. And it validates Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s decision to use Senate rules to shut her down.

These episodes reveal much about America 2017.

They reflect, first, the poisoned character of our politics. The language of Warren — that Sessions is stepped in “racism, sexism & bigotry” echoes the ugliest slander of the Hillary Clinton campaign, where she used similar words to describe Trump’s “deplorables.”

Such language, reflecting as it does the beliefs of one-half of America about the other, rules out any rapprochement in America’s social or political life. This is pre-civil war language.

For how do you sit down and work alongside people you believe to be crypto-Nazis, Klansmen and fascists? Apparently, you don’t. Rather, you vilify them, riot against them, deny them the right to speak or to be heard.

And such conduct is becoming common on campuses today.

As for Trump’s disparagement of the judges, only someone ignorant of history can view that as frightening.

Have something to say about this column?
Visit Pat's FaceBook page and post your comments….Thomas Jefferson not only refused to enforce the Alien & Sedition Acts of President John Adams, his party impeached Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase who had presided over one of the trials.

Jackson defied Chief Justice John Marshall’s prohibition against moving the Cherokees out of Georgia to west of the Mississippi, where, according to the Harvard resume of Sen. Warren, one of them bundled fruitfully with one of her ancestors, making her part Cherokee.

When Chief Justice Roger Taney declared that President Abraham Lincoln’s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus violated the Constitution, Lincoln considered sending U.S. troops to arrest the chief justice.

FDR proposed adding six justices to emasculate a Supreme Court of the “nine old men” he reviled for having declared some New Deal schemes unconstitutional.

President Eisenhower called his Supreme Court choices Earl Warren and William Brennan two of the “worst mistakes” he made as president. History bears Ike out. And here we come to the heart of the matter.

Whether the rollout of the president’s temporary travel ban was ill-prepared or not, and whether one agrees or not about which nations or people should be subjected to extreme vetting, the president’s authority in the matter of protecting the borders and keeping out those he sees as potentially dangerous is universally conceded.

That a district judge would overrule the president of the United States on a matter of border security in wartime is absurd.

When politicians don black robes and seize powers they do not have, they should be called out for what they are — usurpers and petty tyrants. And if there is a cause upon which the populist right should unite, it is that elected representatives and executives make the laws and rule the nation. Not judges, and not justices.

Indeed, one of the mightiest forces that has birthed the new populism that imperils the establishment is that unelected justices like Warren and Brennan, and their progeny on the bench, have remade our country without the consent of the governed — and with never having been smacked down by Congress or the president.

Consider. Secularist justices de-Christianized our country. They invented new rights for vicious criminals as though criminal justice were a game. They tore our country apart with idiotic busing orders to achieve racial balance in public schools. They turned over centuries of tradition and hundreds of state, local and federal laws to discover that the rights to an abortion and same-sex marriage were there in Madison’s Constitution all along. We just couldn’t see them.

Trump has warned the judges that if they block his travel ban, and this results in preventable acts of terror on American soil, they will be held accountable. As rightly they should.

Meanwhile, Trump’s White House should use the arrogant and incompetent conduct of these federal judges to make the case not only for creating a new Supreme Court, but for Congress to start using Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution — to restrict the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, and to reclaim its stolen powers.

A clipping of the court’s wings is long overdue.

Remember the Papa John’s Murder of Gordon Schaffer in Columbia, Tennessee? WEJB/NSU’s David in TN is Still on the Case! (Update)

 

War crime victim Gordon Schaffer, 22 


Suspected war criminal Darious Fitzpatrick, though only 17 at the time of the war crime in 2014, was already a violent career criminal with several felony convictions as a juvenile; his example is spurring calls for juvenile justice reform in Tennessee
 


Suspected war criminal Kevoyeh Pye
 


The newest suspected war criminal is Majestick Alveleano Gillespie
 

By David in TN

There was no hearing today (February 9) for Majestik Gillespie. It took two hours to find this out. I went by the Circuit Court Office and a motions hearing for Darious Fitzpatrick is scheduled for March 3. The trial date for Fitzpatrick in the murder of Gordon Schaffer is (for now) June 26.

Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 4:13:00 P.M. EST
 

[N.S.: The previous night, David had written,]

I'm going to attend the Gillespie hearing tomorrow morning. If I can, I'll go by the Circuit Court Office and see if I can find out about a trial date for Fitzpatrick.

Good point about the media blackout after the initial publicity. Remember the Pearcy Massacre? The same thing.

Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 12:18:00 A.M. EST
 

[N.S. I long ago lost count of how many times David has driven out to the court house, in search of information on this case, or to attend scheduled hearings, which rarely seem to take place. It’s a thankless job, and I thank him from the bottom of my heart for his time and labors.
Aside from defendants and victims’ families, court houses are full every day with people who are there, because they are paid to be. David is there, because he’s on a mission.]

Ninth Circus Rules Against President Trump, the Constitution, Federal Statute, and Precedent, be Damned!

By Nicholas Stix

Next Stop, the USSC. But that’s become very problematic, thanks to the suddenly opportunistic Supreme Court designate Neil Gorsuch, not to mention John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy.

John McCain: We Must Declare War on Russia!

Sen. John McCain: “What we need to do is understand Vladimir Putin for what he is: a murderer and a thug.” https://t.co/fghiXF80be pic.twitter.com/2NSRi8cgO2

— CNN (@CNN) February 9, 2017

Translation: We must go to war with Russia. And with every other "thug" running a government Conclusion: We must go to war with most of the world's nations.

Let’s see. On Election Eve and shortly after the election, who was relentlessly beating the drums for war with Russia, and then trying to bully Pres. Trump into making an enemy of Putin, and bringing about World War III?